For få uker siden flommet den gnoreske offentligheten av gledesbudskaper om en
ny nedrustningens globale tidsalder (har det noengang vært en slik?). Det var
selvsagt ledd i en Bush II/Putin-reklamekampagne, og kun den gnoreske
journaliststanden slukte som vanlig det hele rått. Her er dokumentasjon for
den faktiske utviklingen mot fler atomvåpen.
Karsten Johansen
Fra Guardian:
Secret plan for N-bomb factory
Berkshire plant will build weapons for use on terrorists, say experts
Mark Townsend
Sunday June 16, 2002
The Observer
A massive nuclear bomb-making factory is being planned for Aldermaston,
raising concern that Britain is heading towards a new era of atomic weapon
production.
The plant will be able to test, design and build a new generation of nuclear
bombs. Arms experts believe it will focus on smaller atomic warheads for use
against terrorist groups and rogue states.
Details to be submitted to West Berkshire planning authorities in the next 10
days reveal plans for one of the most state-of-the-art nuclear weapons plants
in Europe.
Described by environmentalists as one of the most momentous decisions of Tony
Blair's leadership, the plant will cost hundreds of millions of pounds,
despite being officially approved without parliamentary debate, sparking fury
among MPs.
Analysts warn that it appears to be a blatant breach of Britain's obligations
under the nuclear non-proliferation treaty. William Peden, nuclear disarmament
expert at Greenpeace, said: 'We are talking a massive nuclear bomb-making
factory.'
The plans - the existence of which were confirmed by the Atomic Weapons
Establishment - will involve closure of the 270-acre Burghfield site, where
Britain's atomic warheads have been produced for almost 50 years. It will be
replaced by a futuristic complex capable of designing atomic weapons as well
as storing existing Trident warheads at AWE's 700-acre headquarters.
Details of the proposals were discovered in AWE's annual report, which refers
to plans to 'transfer all operations' from Burghfield to the Aldermaston site.
It also reveals proposals for a hydrodynamics research facility to help design
and develop nuclear weapons, a £15 million supercomputer to simulate the
effects of atomic devices and a factory producing tritium, a substance used to
maximise the effects of a nuclear explosion.
An AWE spokesman said they had to 'maintain the capability to design a
successor' to Trident, although the Government had not asked it to start work
on one.
Paul Rogers, professor of peace studies at Bradford University, said: 'But, at
the very least, they want to build the infrastructure to create a new
generation of weapons.
'It is clear that the Government is committing itself to a long-term nuclear
future after Trident. This suggests a nuclear-free world more in theory than
in practice.'
Menzies Campbell , Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, said Government
policy remained unclear.
'There has never been a serious parliamentary debate about a Trident
replacement or what form it should take,' he added. 'But before embarking on
expenditure of this size on an issue of such political controversy, at the
very least Parliament ought to be con sulted. I even suspect that the Cabinet
may not have been involved in the decision. There are also legitimate concerns
about facilities like this after 11 September.'
The planning application will be submitted by the Ministry of Defence on
behalf of AWE, which is responsible for running Britain's nuclear weapons'
sites.
The proposals must abide by normal planning procedures because crown immunity
was removed after AWE - in effect, private contractors - took control of the
running of Aldermaston in 1993. Planning officers do not have the power to
reject the plans but, in the event of strong objection, can demand that
Environment Minister Michael Meacher examines them.
Labour MP Martin Salter - who claims that his Reading West constituency lies
downwind of Aldermaston - said: 'I am appalled that plans have been drawn up
to extend the nuclear weapons plant at Aldermaston without reference to local
communities, or indeed Parliament.'
Tomorrow he will table a series of parliamentary questions about the
Government's long-term nuclear policies.
The revelation arrives amid allegations that the UK is keen to pursue the Bush
administration's lead in wanting to develop a range of tactical nuclear
devices that can be used pre-emptively against terrorist groups or rogue
states.
America's recent Nuclear Posture Review Report details the need for an
'offensive' nuclear deterrent and a revitalised nuclear weapons complex with
massive investment in facilities in order to modernise its weapons production
capability.
Experts point to a series of statements from Defence Secretary Geoff Hoon in
which he insists Britain has a right to use nuclear devices - pre-emptively if
necessary - against states that are not nuclear powers.
Rebecca Johnson, exceutive editor of Disarmament Diplomacy, a leading
independent journal in arms control, warned that US and UK policy was becoming
increasingly 'hand in glove'.
Ian Davis, director of the British American Security Information Council, an
indpendent think-tank, said there was mounting evidence of increased
co-operation between Britain and the US on nuclear policy. Inquiries had found
Labour becoming increasingly secretive over nuclear policy and demanded
'greater parliamentary scrutiny' over future decisions.
Investigations by The Observer confirm increased activity between US and UK
weapons officials. Parliamentary answers from defence ministers reveal the
number of UK defence personnel visiting the US has grown substantially.
Visits to the Nevada nuclear test site have risen from nine in 1999 to 40 last
year with a further 182 meetings between both countries. There are now 16
joint working groups on weaponry issues, including nuclear warhead physics,
nuclear counter-terrorism technology and nuclear weapon code development.
Peden said that the planned development mirrored the secrecy surrounding the
replacement of Polaris with Trident in the late 1970s.New facilities were then
also sited at Aldermaston, but construction was hampered by delays and
escalating costs, which eventually soared to £1.5 billion. There has still
been no official acknowledgment on the type of warhead Trident carries.
An AWE spokesman said the current proposals depend on a number of factors such
as the results of a feasibility study. They also have to be approved by
regulators including the Nuclear Installations Inspectorate. If approved,
construction of the new plant would be included within the current £2.3bn
10-year contract.
He added that leaflets detailing the proposals would be released to the public
in two weeks' time.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 11-07-02 MET DST