Arianna Huffington: Operation Enduring Avarice

From: Per I. Mathisen (Per.Inge.Mathisen@idi.ntnu.no)
Date: 02-11-01


http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/files/103101.html

Operation Enduring Avarice
Filed October 31, 2001
According to our leaders, we are not supposed to let the war on terror
disrupt our normal lives. And, to their credit, they're leading by
example.

For instance, far from the war disrupting the House's normal run of
shameless corporate toadying, it's enhancing it. Indeed, it's giving our
leaders cover to put forward their answer to each and every problem
America faces: a massive corporate giveaway. And they even have the gall
to call it patriotism. Others, using the English language more rigorously,
call it war profiteering.

The so-called economic stimulus package that passed the House last week
would have been scurrilous in times of prosperity. But in this time of
national crisis it is, quite simply, grotesque.

The grisly details include a retroactive elimination of the corporate
alternative minimum tax and a 10 percent cut in the capital gains tax. And
on the other side of the Capitol, the Senate Republicans are proposing an
acceleration of all the top-bracket tax cuts and a return of that old
favorite, the fully tax-deductible three-martini lunch.

The House package is little more than a rehashed corporate wish list,
doling out $115 billion in tax breaks to big business and the wealthiest
taxpayers, and a comparatively measly $14 billion to poor and
moderate-income families in the form of tax rebates and unemployment
benefits. And while the tax cuts for the haves are permanent, those for
the have-nots are good for only one year.

What's more, the money given to corporate America is given without
conditions -- not tax credits tied to investments, but handouts more
likely to end up in CEOs' Christmas bonuses than back in the economy.

All you really need to know about the true nature of this bill can be
found in a largely unnoticed provision that makes permanent a gaping tax
loophole that was about to expire. It allows multinational corporations
such as GE and Ford to avoid paying taxes by shifting profits to their
offshore subsidiaries -- but only if those profits remain overseas. Tell
me, how exactly is providing incentives to keep money out of our economy
supposed to stimulate our economy?

The House bill is so outrageous that even some top GOP officials are
balking. In a rare slip from the party line, Treasury Secretary Paul
O'Neill colorfully criticized it as "show business." Rep. Greg Ganske,
R-Iowa, one of seven Republicans who voted against the bill, labeled it
"an early Christmas card" for "already profitable corporations." And the
president's budget director, Mitch Daniels, informed the nation in a
poetic outburst that "the corral gates" have been blown open and "the
animals are running loose."

The galloping beasts in this case are corporate lobbyists and their chums
on the Hill, Dick Armey and Tom DeLay chief among them.

The juiciest goodie in this box of corporate bon-bons, the retroactive
repeal of the corporate alternative minimum tax, will lead to $25 billion
in instant corporate rebate checks to needy companies such as IBM (slated
to get $1.4 billion), GM ($833 million) and GE ($671 million).

Of the $25 billion refund, over $6.3 billion will be given to just 14
corporations. Not surprisingly, these 14 lucky winners have been regular
and generous political donors. Over the last 10 years, they've poured
almost $15 million in soft money into the national committees of both
parties. It turns out that may be the smartest investment they've ever
made.

Such a blatant quid pro quo is so indefensible that the main champions of
the grandly named Economic Security and Recovery Act aren't even trying
very hard to justify it. Take Armey's wan effort on "Meet the Press."
There he was, half-heartedly trying to convince Tim Russert that we need
these massive tax cuts because the last round of massive tax cuts were not
geared to stimulating the economy. Really? Wasn't that him at a House
subcommittee hearing back in March, selling the last tax cut bill as "just
the shot in the arm that this economy needs"?

Armey then offered us all a lecture on how big corporate giveaways are the
best way to create new jobs. Unfortunately, the facts don't bear him out.
The $15 billion Congress just handed the airline industry hasn't kept it
from laying off 140,000 workers.

Armey also called enhanced unemployment benefits "a feeble response" and
not "commensurate with the American spirit." He went on to promise that
the new stimulus package "will create 170,000 new jobs next year alone."
Not exactly the most heartening news to the 7.8 million people currently
unemployed in the country. What are the 7.63 million left on the sidelines
supposed to do, sit around and cross their fingers, hoping one or two of
the lucky 170,000 will eventually rub their new bosses the wrong way? Is
that more in keeping with the American spirit?

It's time to declare war on war profiteering. But we'll need political
leaders able to dramatize the betrayal of the public trust this bill
represents.

Maybe there are too many numbers with too many zeros to draw the public's
attention away from the latest "general alert" issued by the attorney
general. So let's forget the numbers and focus on the moving story of good
overcoming evil. Let history record that, after Sept. 11, our leaders
brought the nation together and decided to fight the war on terrorism by
making business lunches fully tax-deductible and levying no taxes on
corporate profits patriotically funneled off shore. Call it Operation
Enduring Avarice.

It's enough to put a lump in your throat.



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : 11-07-02 MET DST