Y2K atomvaapen - fax Jeltsin og Clinton

jonivar skullerud (jonivar@bigfoot.com)
Fri, 27 Aug 1999 08:32:33 +0930

En verdensomspennende fax-kampanje for å fjerne muligheten for en
atomvåpenkatastrofe ved nyttår er på gang. Spre dette til alle
interesserte kontakter!

---- Start of forwarded text ----
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 15:48:21 +1000
From: FoE Sydney - Nuclear Campaign <nonukes@foesyd.org.au>
Subject: FROM SEPT 1, FAX YELTSIN, CLINTON TO TAKE N-WEAPONS OFF ALERT.

PLEASE DO THESE FROM SEPTEMBER 1 WHEN THE GLOBAL FAX CAMPAIGN KICKS IN.

John Hallam
Friends of the Earth Sydney,
17 Lord street, Newtown, NSW, Australia,
Fax(61)(2)9517-3902 ph (61)(2)9517-3903

nonukes@foesyd.org.au http://homepages.tig.com.au/~foesyd
http://homepages.tig.com.au/~foesyd/nuclear/bbletter.html

APPEAL: THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN THE WORLD BETWEEN NOW AND DECEMBER31

FROM SEPT 1, FAX YELTSIN, CLINTON TO TAKE N-WEAPONS OFF ALERT.

PRESIDENT BORIS YELTSIN, +7-095-205-4330,
PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, +1-202-456-2461,

Dear All,

You will be getting many messages of this kind because this is possibly the
most important single issue that can ever come your way between now and the
next year.

Following this appeal there are two sample letters, one from FOE Australia
and one from Bob Tiller of PSR USA.

I urge you to act on them.

I am writing to urge you to fax Presidents Yeltsin and Clinton from Sept 1
onwards to take strategic nuclear weapons off alert before December, and to
ask that the de- alerting of strategic nuclear weapons be discussed at the
coming September 21 meeting of the G8.

This is of absolutely vital importance. Getting 5000 nuclear missiles off
alert status before the Y2k bug plays havoc with their command and control
systems is just about the most important thing anyone can possibly do.

Arguably there is simply no other issue this important between now and
December/January.
It might be literally a matter of survival.

Can you get this appeal and the two sample letters out to your networks as
fast as you can and ask them to fax it from September 1?

If people wish to customise from the two letters that is best.

It's important I think, to get it out as fast as possible, but ask people
to stick to the sept 1 date (or after).

Please try to fax from September 1 onwards, preferably not before.

Please use the fax numbers I have provided. The numbers here work. I've
just checked them.

Try and get everyone you know to do it.

If you are a large organisation please try and get all your members to do it.

Many thanks and may the fax gremlins smile on you!

John Hallam.

DRAFT MODEL LETTER TO YELTSIN AND CLINTON FOR GLOBAL FAX CAMPAIGN STARTING
SEPTEMBER 1

PRESIDENT BORIS YELTSIN, +7-095-205-4330,

PRESIDENT BILL CLINTON, +1-202-456-2461,

Dear Presidents Yeltsin, and Clinton,
I am writing to you to convey my extreme concern over the possibility that
Y2K -related problems in the computerised command, control, and monitoring
systems of nuclear forces and weapon systems, may give rise to an
unacceptable risk of accidental nuclear war, as a result of incorrect data
and miscalculation. I therefore urge you to solve the problem by taking
your nuclear forces off alert, or by standing them down.

I ask that standing down nuclear forces in view of the problems posed by
the 'Millennium Bug', be a matter for urgent priority discussions at the G8
Summit in Berlin on Sept 21. As well asY2K considerations, taking nuclear
weapons off alert will increase strategic stability and confidence, and
eliminate the possibility of accidental nuclear war.

I would remind you that your two countries have some 5000 strategic nuclear
weapons that are able to be fired within a time span of 15-30 minutes.

This must never happen. Should it do so, not only would your two countries
cease to exist, but it is entirely possible that human life and maybe all
life life on the planet, could be terminated.

Any risk of this happening at any time, Y2K or otherwise, no matter how
small, is unacceptable.

However, the Y2K problem adds another layer of uncertainty to the risk that
already exists.

Taking nuclear forces off alert was strongly recommended by the Canberra
Commission on the Elimination of Nuclear Weapons in 1996, and a number of
resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly have urged that it be
done.

Taking nuclear weapons off alert and placing them in a state in which hours
to days rather than minutes or seconds would be required to make them
launch ready, would effectively eliminate the risk of accidental nuclear
war due to the Y2K computer problem. It would also make impossible the
many non-Y2K related problems that have many times brought us to within
minutes of a possible nuclear exchange.

De-Alerting will cost you nothing, and can be done by a simple executive
order to stand down nuclear forces.

The UK has already altered its 'notice to fire' from minutes to days.

We/I urge you to do likewise.

The stakes involved far outweigh any considerations of national pride,
national interest, or even national security. Indeed, the immediate stakes
are so high, and the potential for global catastrophe so clear that
mutually verified de- alerting must now take precedence over all other
considerations.

Signed...
etc

>-------------------------------------------
>Dear Presidents Yeltsin and Clinton:
>
>The Cold War ended years ago, but the nuclear danger endures, menacing
>us all. Thousands of nuclear weapons remain on high-alert in the United
>States and Russia. Although both countries have announced their
>"de-targeting" of the other, that step is virtually meaningless when
>both countries keep their weapons on alert and maintain a
>launch-on-warning posture.
>
>Keeping nuclear weapons on hair-trigger alert does not add to the
>security of either nation; indeed it makes all of us less secure. You
>are well aware of the various occasions when Russia and the U.S. came
>close to launching nuclear weapons because of misunderstanding or poor
>data. Removing the weapons from hair-trigger alert would eliminate the
>risk of hasty reaction.
>
>Therefore I urge you to lessen the nuclear danger by removing all
>nuclear weapons from high-alert. This can be accomplished in a matter
>of weeks without treaty negotiation or ratification.
>
>This approach has worked before. In 1991 President George Bush took the
>bold step of removing hundreds of U.S. nuclear weapons from high-alert
>status, and in response Mikhail Gorbachev did the same with hundreds of
>Soviet weapons. Now we need similar courageous leadership to finish the
>process that they started.
>
>De-alerting takes on added urgency this year. When January 1, 2000
>arrives, no one will know if all of the Y2K computer problems have been
>fixed. Why court disaster by having nuclear warheads on hair-trigger
>alert when we do not know how the computers in the nuclear system will
>function?
>
>Last year the United Nations General Assembly overwhelmingly passed a
>resolution which calls on the nuclear weapons states to de-alert their
>weapons. It is wise counsel. For the sake of our children and
>grandchildren, please de-alert all nuclear weapons now.
>
>Sincerely,

---- End of forwarded text ----

-- 
    ______        _________________________________________________
   /             |                                                 |
   | jon         |  jonivar skullerud                              |
   \______       |                                                 |
          \      |  jonivar@bigfoot.com                            |
     ivar |      |  http://www.bigfoot.com/~jonivar/               |
   _______/      |_________________________________________________|