Siste om Racak

From: Knut Rognes (knrognes@online.no)
Date: Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:09:12 MET

  • Next message: Oddmund Garvik: ""Deilig å være norsk""

    KK-Forum,

    siste om Racak. Iflg mine kilder er ikke noe av dette nevnt i engelsk eller
    amerikansk presse foreløpig.

    Knut Rognes

    **************(1)*****************
    http://www.BerlinOnline.de/suche/.bin/mark.cgi/aktuelles/berliner_zeitung/po
    litik/.html/1510.html?keywords=racak

    "... Der Expertenbericht für die im Niederländischen Verlag Elsevier
    herausgegebene Fachzeitschrift "Forensic Science International" bestätigt
    die Schlussfolgerungen, zu denen die "Berliner Zeitung" in Auswertung
    geheim gehaltener Autopsie-Protokolle bereits im März 2000 gekommen war:
    Die seinerzeit von der OSZE und vielen westlichen Politikern behaupteten
    Beweise für eine Massenhinrichtung albanischer Zivilisten durch serbische
    Sicherheitskräfte gibt es nicht. ..."

    "... Rantas geheimes Referat

    Aufschlussreich ist in diesem Zusammenhang die Tatsache, dass auf
    politischer Ebene bis zum heutigen Tag eine Veröffentlichung der
    Untersuchungsergebnisse verhindert wurde."

    "... Nach Kriegsende stellte Frau Ranta im EU-Auftrag erneut
    Nachforschungen zu Racak an. Am 21. Juni 2000 lieferte sie einen Bericht
    beim Jugoslawien-Tribunal ab, das das angebliche Massaker von Racak zu
    einem der wesentlichen Anklagepunkte gegen die Alte jugoslawische Führung
    gemacht hatte. Der Bericht wurde sofort geheimgestempelt. Tags darauf
    referierte Frau Ranta hinter verschlossener Tür vor Beamten der EU-Staaten
    über ihre Erkenntnisse. Doch auch dieses Referat blieb geheim. Nicht nur
    den Medien, sondern sogar Europa-Parlamentariern wurde verwehrt, sich mit
    den Aussagen vertraut zu machen. Vielleicht hängt das damit zusammen, dass
    Frau Ranta auch vor den EU-Beamten wiederholte, was sie einer mit der
    "Berliner Zeitung" kooperierenden kanadischen Journalistin - weit weg von
    der interessierten europäischen Öffentlichkeit - mitteilte: Dass ihre
    Recherche die offizielle Version einer Massenhinrichtung nicht untermauert;
    dass sie nicht wisse, was in Racak wirklich passiert sei."

    "... Auch auf jugoslawischer Seite ist der Fall Racak präsent. Mit Blick
    auf die ständigen Überfalle albanischer Freischärler auf die
    entmilitarisierte Pufferzone, die nach dem Kosovo-Krieg auf Nato-Druck
    zwischen Zentralserbien und dem UN-verwalteten Kosovo errichtet worden war,
    zog Jugoslawiens Präsident Vojislav Kostunica bereits Parallelen zur
    Situation im Winter 1998/99. Er betonte den Willen, "die Souveränität des
    Landes im südlichen Serbien zu verteidigen". Zugleich aber warnte er,
    Jugoslawien dürfe nicht wieder hineingezogen werden in "eine Art
    Provokation" wie in Racak, die "eine internationale Intervention" ausgelöst
    habe..."

    and

    http://www.BerlinOnline.de/suche/.bin/mark.cgi/aktuelles/berliner_zeitung/po
    litik/.html/1940.html?keywords=racak
    ***********************************

    ***********(2)****************
    Supplied by BBC Worldwide Monitoring
    January 18, 2001, Thursday
    HEADLINE: Yugoslav president explains reasons for deciding to meet Del Ponte
    SOURCE: Radio Belgrade in Serbo-Croat 1400 gmt 18 Jan 01

    Text of on news conference given by FRY President Vojislav Kostunica in
    Belgrade on 18 January, broadcast by Serbian radio the same day

    Reporter Jelena Hinic The possible change in Montenegro's status must take
    into account the constitution of the Republic of Montenegro and the federal
    constitution, President Kostunica said, and continued:

    Kostunica I do not know what the outcome of the elections will be, and much
    depends on that outcome. Also, if the political strand which today holds the
    majority in Montenegro wins the elections, I do not know whether it will
    adhere to the procedure stipulated by the constitution for changing the
    constitution and passing a new one, either the Yugoslav or the Montenegrin
    one. In any case, Belgrade will not do anything that would prevent those who
    win the majority in Montenegro to decide whatever they may decide, including
    the decision to go ahead with Montenegro's independence which is what
    President Djukanovic favours. I wish to stress this along with another fact,
    and that is that we will do nothing that could be used as an excuse in the
    complex relations between Serbia and Montenegro.

    Hinic Commenting on the meeting with Slobodan Milosevic, President Kostunica
    said:

    Kostunica I wanted to demonstrate that a code of behaviour different from
    the code followed in the past is being followed in the country since 5
    October. The presidents of the state will talk to the presidents of
    opposition parties when these ask to be received for talks. I would also
    like to stress something for all those who have trouble remembering or are
    prone to forgetting, and that is that I have spoken with Slobodan Milosevic
    twice in my life and both times publicly. The first occasion was on 6
    October 2000, and the second time on 13 January 2001 and on both occasions I
    spoke to a Milosevic who was no longer in power.

    Hinic Commenting on the possible meeting with the Hague tribunal's
    Prosecutor Carla Del Ponte, President Kostunica said the following:

    Kostunica Let me say that I had not planned on meeting with her because I am
    busy. I have mentioned all the things that are keeping me busy and I had not
    planned to meet her because there are many other, more relevant people who
    are involved with these issues. But allow me to say at this news conference
    today that there were several things that influenced me to change my
    decision and to receive Carla Del Ponte: there are three things; first, the
    affair, or scandal and great lie that has finally come to light about the
    use of depleted uranium. A number of nongovernmental organizations, those
    that are not on foreign payrolls which is why their voice was never heard or
    was stifled, had repeatedly pointed this out - both in the country and
    abroad, in 1995. In 1995, depleted uranium was used to bomb the Serb
    Republic. That is a very, very serious matter for the Hague Tribunal. If it
    wishes to prove that it is a court, then this is a test. The second very
    important event is Racak where mass killing of Kosovo Albanians said to have
    taken place in 1999 . Racak served to bring about Rambouillet, it served to
    bring about the blackmail in Rambouillet which led to the bombing of
    Yugoslavia. My position on this issue is very well known. Slobodan Milosevic
    and the former regime were in a position to avoid both Racak and Rambouillet
    if they had conducted a different policy and resolved the Kosovo issue. They
    did not resolve it, but that does not justify those who were in a position
    on 24 March 1999 to avoid 24 March 1999; however, the entire scenario,
    including Racak, was put into circulation, and now that is has become clear
    that this was something that was staged, I have an additional reason to meet
    Carla Del Ponte. The third reason is connected to an unusual proposal
    presented in what I perceive to be a very unusual and aggressive manner and
    tone by Mrs Del Ponte and her spokesmen, and in what I would call a very
    incomprehensible manner changes thought by the Hague Tribunal and Carla Del
    Ponte as if there are no other judges or court presidents, and so forth.
    sentence as heard Carla Del Ponte's very unusual and aggressive proposal
    involves her presenting me with sealed indictments. Sealed indictments are,
    to put it simply, a disgrace for all those who have known for centuries what
    law is and what it should be.

    United Press International
    January 18, 2001, Thursday 01:29 PM Eastern Time
    SECTION: GENERAL NEWS
    HEADLINE: bc-yugoslavia-kostunica
    BYLINE: By STEFAN RACIN
    DATELINE: BELGRADE, Yugoslavia, Jan. 18

    Yugoslav President Vojislav Kostunica said Thursday he would meet a
    representative of the Yugoslav war crimes tribunal not to discuss the
    extradition of former President Slobodan Milosevic, as the tribunal wants,
    but to talk about NATO's use of depleted uranium in the Balkans and a recent
    report that cleared Yugoslav forces of killing Albanian civilians in 1999.

    Kostunica had previously said he would not meet war crimes prosecutor Carla
    Del Ponte and said Milosevic and other indictees must be tried in
    Yugoslavia.

    "I didn't think to meet with her because of my busy schedules, but there are
    several reasons to change this decision," Kostunica said. "The first is the
    shameful affair just brought to light about the use of depleted uranium."

    Kostunica said he wanted to discuss NATO's 1995 bombing of Republika Srpska,
    the Bosnian Serb republic, with uranium-tipped shells.

    "This is a very, very serious matter for the Hague tribunal," Kostunica
    said.

    Del Ponte, chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Tribunal for the
    former Yugoslavia in The Hague, Netherlands, said she would arrive in
    Belgrade Jan. 23 for a three-day visit. She said she hoped to see Kostunica
    to hand him open and sealed indictments against a number of Serbs and urge
    him to extradite his predecessor, Milosevic, the tribunal's main indictee.

    Kostunica described this as "an unusual offer made to me in an very unusual
    manner, in a very aggressive tone."

    "Sealed indictments are simply a shame for all those who know what law had
    been for centuries," he said. "Therefore, naturally I will receive these
    indictments and put them at the disposal of our government and our
    parliament."

    Kostunica also said he would raise the issue of the reported massacre of
    ethnic Albanians in the Racak village of Kosovo by Yugoslav troops in 1999.
    At the time, U.S. diplomat Peter Walker led a team from the Organization for
    Security and Cooperation in Europe to the area and said a number of
    Albanians were shot dead from close range by Yugoslav police and left
    unburied in a ditch. Earlier this week, however, Finnish researchers used
    forensic evidence and said no massacre took place. Their findings were
    published in Germany's Berliner Zeitung newspaper.

    Kostunica said reports of the massacre were a ploy used by the West to
    blackmail Yugoslav negotiators into accepting their terms for a settlement
    before their eventual bombing of the country.
    *********************************'



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 19 2001 - 11:12:33 MET