LIES, HATRED and FORCE

From: Bruce Taylor (Bruce.Taylor@hedb.uib.no)
Date: Fri Oct 13 2000 - 10:53:56 MET DST

  • Next message: Magnus Edgren: "Fri, 13 Oct 2000 13:37:18 CEST"

    Fψlgende kom inn fra en e-post liste jeg abonnerer pε:

    >Return-path: <MERL@middleeast.org>
    >Envelope-to: Bruce.Taylor@hedb.uib.no
    >Delivery-date: Fri, 13 Oct 2000 02:48:42 +0200
    >X-Sent: 13 Oct 2000 00:48:29 GMT
    >X-Sender: MERL@MiddleEast.Org
    >From: MER <MERL@MiddleEast.Org>
    >To: "MER" <MERL@MiddleEast.Org>
    >Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2000 20:47:03 +0000
    >Subject: LIES, HATRED and FORCE
    >Reply-To: MER@MiddleEast.Org
    >Organization: MiD-EasT RealitieS
    >
    > _______ ____ ______
    > / |/ / /___/ / /_ // M I D - E A S T R E A L I T I E S
    > / /|_/ / /_/_ / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
    >/_/ /_/ /___/ /_/ \\ http://www.MiddleEast.Org
    >
    > News, Information, & Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
    > and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
    > - - - - - - - - - -
    > IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
    > To receive MER regularly email to INFOMER@MiddleEast.Org
    >
    >
    >
    > LIES, HATRED AND THE LANGUAGE OF FORCE
    >
    > Arab View
    >
    > By Robert Fisk, Middle East Correspondent
    >
    > The Independent, London, 13 October 2000:
    > This is a story about lies, bias, hatred and death. It's about our
    > inability – after more than half a century – to understand the
    > injustice of the Middle East. It's about a part of the world where
    > it seems quite natural, after repeatedly watching on television
    > the funeral of 11-year-old Sami Abu Jezar – who died two days
    > after being shot through the forehead by Israeli soldiers – for a
    > crowd to kick two Israeli plainclothes agents to death. It's
    > about a nation that claims "purity of arms" but fires missiles at
    > civilian apartment blocks and then claims it is "restoring
    > order". It's about people who are so enraged by the killing of
    > almost a hundred Palestinians that they try to blow up an
    > entire American warship.
    >
    > It's as simple as that. When I walked into the local photocopy
    > shop yesterday afternoon, the boys there greeted me with
    > ecstatic smiles. "Did you hear that an American ship has been
    > attacked?" one of them asked. "There are Americans dead."
    > All I saw around the room were smiles. In a corner, on a small
    > television screen, an Israeli Apache aircraft was firing a
    > missile at Yasser Arafat's headquarters in Gaza.
    >
    > Seven years ago, CNN showed us the Israeli prime minister
    > shaking Yasser Arafat by the hand, live on the White House
    > lawn. Now, live from Gaza, we watch a pilot carrying out an
    > order from the Israeli prime minister to kill Arafat by bombing
    > his headquarters.
    >
    > As usual last night, the television news broadcasts – those
    > most obsequious and deforming of information dispensers –
    > were diverting our minds from the truth. They did not ask why
    > the Palestinians should have lynched two Israeli undercover
    > men. Instead, they asked why Palestinian police had not
    > protected them. They did not ask why a suicide bomber in a
    > rubber boat should have bombed the USS Cole.
    >
    > Instead, they asked who he was, who he worked for, and they
    > interviewed Pentagon officials who denounced "terrorism".
    > Always the "who" or the "what"; never the "why".
    >
    > It is of course possible that Osama bin Laden, one of the
    > more recent American hate figures, could have inspired – by
    > sermons rather than direct instruction – the attack on the USS
    > Cole. Bin Laden's family originally came from Yemen. And it
    > was Yemen that demanded the right earlier this week to fly
    > arms direct to the Palestinians of the occupied territories –
    > provoked, it seems, by slow-motion footage of yet another boy,
    > a 12-year-old, dying on top of his father in Gaza after being
    > shot by the Israelis. Yet many of the attacks on Israeli
    > occupation forces in Lebanon were carried out by young men,
    > unconnected with the corrupt Arab political ιlite but enraged
    > by the injustice of their lot. Maybe it was the same in Yemen.
    >
    > When Yasser Arafat signed the Oslo agreement seven years
    > ago, only a very few asked how soon this raddled, flawed,
    > hopeless "peace" would collapse. I thought it would end in
    > violence because the Palestinians were being forced by
    > Americans and Israelis to sign a peace that would give them
    > neither a state nor an end to Jewish settlements on Arab land,
    > nor a capital in Arab east Jerusalem.
    >
    > I wrote that Arafat had been turned from "super-terrorist" into a
    > "super-statesman" but could easily be turned into a
    > "super-terrorist" again. And so it came to pass. Yesterday, the
    > Israeli spokesman Avi Pasner shared a BBC interview with
    > me – and called Arafat a "terrorist".
    >
    > Alas, none of it was surprising – none save our continued
    > inability to grasp what happens when a whole society is
    > pressure-cooked to the point of explosion. A Pentagon official
    > was saying last night the US government was trying to find out
    > if the attack on the USS Cole was "related" to "violence" in the
    > Middle East. Come again? Related? Violence? Who can
    > doubt that the attempt to sink the Cole and all her 360
    > American crew was directed at a nation now held responsible
    > for Israel's killing of scores of Palestinian civilians? The
    > United States – despite all the claptrap from Madeleine
    > Albright about "honest brokers" – is Israel's ally.
    >
    > Ever since Arafat tried to leave the US ambassador's
    > residence in Paris two weeks ago, the Palestinians have
    > placed this responsibility on America's shoulders. If the US
    > wants to go on supporting an ally that shoots down
    > Palestinians in the streets of the occupied territories, then the
    > United States will be held to account. And will pay for it.
    >
    > No, of course this does not excuse the bloodthirsty killing of
    > armed Israeli agents or the desecration of the Tomb of
    > Joseph in Nablus, or, indeed, the murder of Jewish settlers.
    > But the cruelty of the Palestinians can be explained by the
    > cruelty of the Israelis. The death toll among Palestinians now
    > is almost exactly equal to that at Qana in 1996 when Israeli
    > gunners butchered 106 Lebanese civilians. We called it a
    > massacre. The Israelis said it was a mistake. True, it's
    > scarcely 5 per cent of the death toll at the Sabra and Chatila
    > refugee camps, when Israel's militia allies killed up to 2,000
    > Palestinian civilians. We called that a massacre. Israel said
    > this, too, was a mistake. Like they called the death of two
    > 12-year-old children and a seven-year-old child and Sami Abu
    > Jezar a mistake.
    >
    > And yesterday – with no institutional memory to guide them –
    > journalists were taking at face value Israel's extraordinary
    > claim that they fired "only at military targets", that the civilian
    > population of Gaza had been "told to evacuate" the areas to be
    > bombed. Do I not seem to remember how the Israelis said in
    > 1982 that in Lebanon they "only fired at military targets" – and
    > left more than 17,000 civilians dead in two months? Do I not
    > recall that the Israelis ordered the villagers of Mansouri to
    > "evacuate" before they shelled it in 1996, then attacked their
    > cars on the road and fired a missile into the back of an
    > ambulance, killing four children and three women – the
    > missile made, of course, by the Boeing company of America?
    >
    > And was not the CIA supposed to be training the Palestinian
    > policemen now being derided by Mr Pasner as "terrorists" (his
    > own country having personally vetted which of them should
    > carry arms)? And was not the United States the guarantor and
    > broker of the disastrous Oslo agreement? So is it really
    > surprising that the Palestinians – indeed, the Arabs – blame
    > the United States for the tragedy unfolding in the Holy Land?
    >
    > And is it any less surprising that the Israelis have now turned
    > on the man w ith whom they thought they would conclude a
    > peace that would turn "Palestine" into a Bantustan? The man
    > who was supposed to "control" the Palestinians, who was
    > supposed to lock up opponents of the "peace process" –
    > whether they be peaceful or violent – is not doing what he was
    > told. He walked out of Camp David because it was a
    > surrender too far. So President Clinton blamed him for the
    > conference's failure – on Israeli television, of all places – and
    > ordered Arafat not to declare a state. Or else.
    >
    > And now, when two US presidential contenders – Messrs
    > Bush and Gore – try to out-do each other in their love and
    > loyalty for Israel, can America comprehend what is
    > happening?
    >
    > I suppose it's the same old story. The Israelis only want
    > peace. The unruly, riotous, murderous Palestinians – totally to
    > blame for 95 of their own deaths – understand only violence.
    >
    > That's what Israel's military spokesman said last night. Force,
    > he said, "will be the only language they understand". Which is
    > about as near to a declaration of war as you can get.
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > MiD-EasT RealitieS - www.MiddleEast.Org
    > Phone: 202 362-5266 Fax: 815 366-0800
    > Email: MER@MiddleEast.Org
    >
    >To subscriibe email to MERLIST@MiddleEast.Org with subject SUBSCRIBE
    >To unsubscribe email to MERLIST@MiddleEast.Org with subject UNSUBSCRIBE
    >
    >
    >

    --
    Bruce Taylor                    Bruce.Taylor@hedb.uib.no
    HF fakultetets EDB-seksjon      Computing Section, Faculty of the Arts
    Universitetet i Bergen 
    N-5007 Bergen  NORWAY
    



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 13 2000 - 09:59:28 MET DST