BBC: US-KLA collusion in provoking war with Serbia

From: Knut Rognes (knrognes@online.no)
Date: Thu Mar 16 2000 - 20:51:58 MET

  • Next message: Knut Rognes: "Ny krig?"

    KK-Forum,

    noe interessant fra BBC reportasjen søndag 12. mars (og som forhåpentligvis
    kommer på NRK) mm. Fra
    http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/mar2000/koso-m16.shtml

    Knut Rognes

    ******************
    British documentary substantiates US-KLA collusion in provoking war with
    Serbia
    Related Sunday Times article alleges CIA role
    By Chris Marsden
    16 March 2000

    Back to screen version

    On Sunday, March 12, Britain's BBC2 television channel ran a documentary by
    Alan Little entitled "Moral Combat: NATO At War". The program contained
    damning evidence of how the Clinton administration set out to create a
    pretext for declaring war against the Milosevic regime in Serbia by
    sponsoring the separatist Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA), then pressed this
    decision on its European allies. The revelations in the documentary were
    reinforced by an accompanying article in the Sunday Times.

    Little conducted frank interviews with leading players in the Kosovo
    conflict, the most pertinent being those with US Secretary of State
    Madeline Albright, Assistant Secretary of State James Rubin, US Envoy
    Richard Holbrooke, William Walker, head of the UN Verification Mission, and
    KLA leader Hashim Thaci. These were supplemented by many others.

    The documentary set out to explain how "a shared enmity towards Milosevic"
    made "allies of a shadowy band of guerrillas and the most powerful nations
    on earth”.

    Ever since the Bosnian war of 1995, the KLA, seeking to capitalise on
    popular resentment among Kosovan Albanians against the regime in Belgrade,
    had pursued a strategy of destabilising the Serbian province of Kosovo by
    acts of terrorism, in the hope that the US and NATO would intervene. They
    ambushed Serb patrols and killed policemen.

    "Any armed action we undertook would bring retaliation against civilians,"
    KLA leader Thaci explained. "We knew we were endangering a great number of
    civilian lives." The benefits of this strategy were made plain by Dug
    Gorani, a Kosovo Albanian negotiator not tied to the KLA: "The more
    civilians were killed, the chances of international intervention became
    bigger, and the KLA of course realised that. There was this foreign
    diplomat who once told me, 'Look, unless you pass the quota of five
    thousand deaths you'll never have anybody permanently present in Kosovo
    from foreign diplomacy.'"

    Albright was receptive to the KLA's strategy because the US was anxious to
    stage a military conflict with Serbia. Her series of interviews began
    chillingly with the words: "I believed in the ultimate power, the goodness
    of the power of the allies and led by the United States." The KLA's
    campaign of provocations was seized upon as the vehicle through which the
    use of this power could be sanctioned.

    A March 5, 1998 attack by the Serbian army on the home in Prekaz of a
    leading KLA commander, Adem Jashari, in which 53 people died, became the
    occasion for a meeting of the Contact group of NATO powers four days later.
    Albright pushed for a tough anti-Serbian response. "I thought it behoved me
    to say to my colleagues that we could not repeat the kinds of mistakes that
    had happened over Bosnia, where there was a lot of talk and no action," she
    told Little.

    NATO threatened Belgrade with a military response for the first time. "The
    ambitions of the KLA, and the intentions of the NATO allies, were
    converging," Little commented. He then showed how a subsequent public
    meeting between US Envoy Richard Holbrooke and KLA personnel at Junik
    angered Belgrade and gave encouragement to the Albanian separatists.
    General Nebojsa Pavkovic, the commander of the Yugoslav army in Kosovo,
    states, "When the official ambassador of another country arrives here,
    ignores state officials, but holds a meeting with the Albanian terrorists,
    then it's quite clear they are getting support."

    Lirak Cejal, a KLA soldier, went further, "I knew that since then, that the
    USA, NATO, will put us in their hands. They were looking for the head of
    the KLA, and when they found it they will have it in their hand, and then
    they will control the KLA."

    By October 1998 NATO had succeeded in imposing a cease-fire agreement,
    partly by threat of force and partly because of Serbia's success in routing
    the KLA. A cease-fire monitoring force [the Kosovo Verification Mission]
    was sent into the province under the auspices of the Organisation for
    Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and headed by William Walker.

    The interview with Cejal is the only reference to US control of the KLA in
    Little's documentary, and then it is only anecdotal. It seems that the BBC
    for its own reasons chose to back-pedal on this issue, given the article in
    the Sunday Times that ran the same day Little's documentary was aired.
    Times journalists Tom Walker and Aidan Laverty wrote: "Several Americans
    who were directly involved in CIA activities or close to them have spoken
    to the makers of Moral Combat, a documentary to be broadcast on BBC2
    tonight, and to The Sunday Times about their clandestine roles ‘in giving
    covert assistance to the KLA' before NATO began its bombing campaign in
    Kosovo."

    The Sunday Times explained that the anonymous sources "admitted they helped
    to train the Kosovo Liberation Army". They add that CIA officers were
    "cease-fire monitors in Kosovo in 1998 and 1999, developing ties with the
    KLA and giving American military training manuals and field advice on
    fighting the Yugoslav army and Serbian police.”

    The Times article continued: "When the Organisation for Security and
    Co-operation in Europe (OSCE), which co-ordinated the monitoring, left
    Kosovo a week before airstrikes began a year ago, many of its satellite
    telephones and global positioning systems were secretly handed to the KLA,
    ensuring that guerrilla commanders could stay in touch with NATO and
    Washington. Several KLA leaders had the mobile phone number of General
    Wesley Clark, the NATO commander."

    The article goes on to cite unnamed "European diplomats then working for
    the OSCE" who "claim it was betrayed by an American policy that made air
    strikes inevitable." They cite a European envoy accusing OSCE head of
    mission Walker of running a CIA operation: "The American agenda consisted
    of their diplomatic observers, aka the CIA, operating on completely
    different terms to the rest of Europe and the OSCE."

    Walker was the American ambassador to El Salvador when the US was helping
    to suppress leftist rebels there and is widely suspected of being a CIA
    operative. He denies this, but admitted to the Sunday Times that the CIA
    was almost certainly involved in the countdown to air strikes: "Overnight
    we went from having a handful of people to 130 or more. Could the agency
    have put them in at that point? Sure they could. It's their job."

    The newspaper cites the more candid comments of its CIA sources: "It was a
    CIA front, gathering intelligence on the KLA's arms and leadership," one
    says. "I'd tell them [the KLA] which hill to avoid, which wood to go
    behind, that sort of thing," said another.

    To back up these claims, the Sunday Times notes that Shaban Shala, a KLA
    commander now active in the campaign to destabilise ethnic Albanian areas
    in Serbia, claims to have met British, American and Swiss agents in
    northern Albania in 1996.

    Little's BBC documentary makes no such explicit suggestion of CIA backing
    for the KLA, but it does put flesh on the bones of how the cease-fire
    became the occasion for strengthening the separatists' grip on Kosovo. He
    explains that wherever the Serbs withdrew their forces in compliance with
    the agreement, the KLA moved in. KLA military leader Agim Ceku says, "The
    cease-fire was very useful for us, it helped us to get organised, to
    consolidate and grow." Nothing was done to prevent this, despite Serbian
    protests.

    Little explains that the BBC has obtained confidential minutes of the North
    Atlantic Council or NAC, NATO's governing body, which state that the KLA
    was "the main initiator of the violence" and that privately Walker called
    its actions a "deliberate campaign of provocation". It was this covert
    backing for the KLA by the US which provoked Serbia into ending its
    cease-fire and sending the army back into Kosovo.

    The next major turn of events leading up to NATO's war against Serbia was
    the alleged massacre of ethnic Albanians at Racek on January 15, 1999. To
    this day, the issue of whether Serbian forces killed civilians in revenge
    attacks at Racek is hotly contested by Belgrade, which claims that the KLA
    staged the alleged massacre, using corpses from earlier fighting.

    It is certainly the case that when the Serb forces pulled out after
    announcing the killing of 15 KLA personnel, international monitors who
    entered the village reported nothing unusual. It was not until the
    following morning, after the KLA had retaken control of the village, that
    Walker made a visit and announced that a massacre by the Serbian police and
    the Yugoslav army had occurred. Little confirms that Walker had contacted
    both Holbrooke and General Clarke before making his announcement.

    Racek was to prove the final pretext for a declaration of war, but first
    Washington had to make sure that the European powers, which, aside from
    Britain, were still pushing for a diplomatic solution, would come on board.
    Talks were convened at Rambouillet, France backed by the threat of war.
    Little explains: "The Europeans, some reluctant converts to the threat of
    force, earnestly pressed for an agreement both the Serbs and the Albanians
    could accept. But the Americans were more sceptical. They had come to
    Rambouillet with an alternative outcome in mind."

    Both Albright and Rubin are extraordinarily candid about what they set out
    to accomplish at Rambouillet. They presented an ultimatum that the Serbian
    government could not possibly accept, because it demanded a NATO occupation
    of not just Kosovo, but unrestricted access to the whole of Serbia. As
    Serbian General Pavcovic comments: "They would have unlimited rights of
    movement and deployment, little short of occupation. Nobody could accept it."

    This was the US's intention. Albright told the BBC: "If the Serbs would not
    agree [to the Rambouillet ultimatum], and the Albanians would agree, then
    there was a very clear cause for using force." Rubin added, "Obviously,
    publicly, we had to make clear we were seeking an agreement, but privately
    we knew the chances of the Serbs agreeing were quite small."

    KLA leader Thaci was the only problem, because he was demanding the
    inclusion of a referendum on independence. So Albright was despatched on
    St. Valentines Day to take charge of winning him over. Veton Suroi, a
    political rival of the KLA involved in the talks, gives a candid
    description of Albright's message to Thaci: "She was saying, you sign, the
    Serbs don't sign, we bomb. You sign, the Serbs sign, you have NATO in. So
    it's up to you."

    After three weeks of discussions, Thaci finally agreed to sign the
    Rambouillet Accord. The path was cleared for the US to begin an open war
    against Serbia, a war that had been prepared with the aid of CIA dirty
    tricks and political manoeuvring with terrorist forces.
    *************************



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Mar 16 2000 - 20:53:33 MET