Cities At Risk From The Year 2000 Computer Crisis

Kai Br=?ISO-8859-1?B?5Q==then (kaibraat@online.no)
Sun, 22 Aug 1999 12:36:42 +0200

Her kommer det mer angående år 2000-problematikken.

Mvh. Kai Braathen

----------
>From: FoE Sydney - Nuclear Campaign <nonukes@foesyd.org.au>
>To: y2k-nuclear@egroups.com, Abolition-caucus@igc.org,
abolition-usa@lists.xmission.com, nukenet@envirolink.org
>Subject: Please Read
>Date: søn 22. aug 1999 10:31
>

>http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/19990811/tc/yk_global_2.html
>
>
>The Pentagon Papers of Y2K
>
>Cities At Risk From The Year 2000 Computer Crisis
>
>By Jim Lord
>
>Jim Lord can be contacted at:
>JimLordY2K@aol.com
>Expanded information is available at:
>www.JimLord.to
>
>
>Secret Government Study Reveals Massive Y2K Problems in American Cities
>
>How many days could New York City survive without water and sewer
>services? How long would it take to evacuate eight million people in
>the dead of winter? Would thousands die in the process? Tens of
>thousands? More? When would the rioting and looting begin? How many
>National Guard troops would it take to control the largest city in the
>nation? What unthinkable devastation would be wrought on the global
>financial system? How might our enemies seize on the ensuing panic and
>confusion?
>
>Are these the crazed speculations of a Y2K alarmist? Not if you know
>what the US Navy and Marine Corps know. According to a June 1999 report
>titled, "Master Utility List", they believe "total failure is likely"
>for New York City's water and sewer systems because of Y2K problems.
>
>And they are holding this information back.
>
>The Navy Department assessment is not limited to New York City; it
>covers all their shore facilities in the world - nearly 500 locations.
>The results are horrifying. They expect more than 26 million American
>citizens in 125 cities to be without electricity, water, gas or sewer
>services next January. Many more would be affected in foreign
>countries. London, England for example is expected to experience
>failures of all four types of utilities. Many of the people impacted by
>these failures would be military personnel and their families.
>
>And the Navy Department isn't telling anyone.
>
>Forty-five of the cities named in the survey have population greater
>than 100,000. Eight of the nation's dozen largest metropolitan areas
>are affected. Here's what the Navy expects:
>
>Dallas - no water.
>Washington DC and Philadelphia - no gas
>Baltimore, Houston, New York and Miami - no water or sewer.
>Atlanta - no water or gas
>San Antonio - no water or electricity.
>Fort Worth and New Orleans - no water, gas or sewer services.
>
>And the Navy Department is saying nothing.
>
>Cities at Risk
>
>The information presented below is based on a US Navy/Marine Corps
>survey dated June 1999. The survey was conducted to determine the risk
>of utility failures at military facilities worldwide. Only United
>States information is shown.
>
>Each of the three tables below shows a list of cities and the Y2K
>exposure of the major utilities in each city. The columns labeled E, W,
>G and S refer to the Electrical, Water, Gas and Sewer utilities. An "x"
>in the column indicates that utility is expected to fail. To view
>expanded information on each city including the names of specific
>utilities, visit www.JimLord.to on the web.
>
>Three levels of possible failure are indicated in the Navy document.
>Each table in this summary lists one of these levels.
>1) Partial failure is probable.
>2) Partial failure is likely.
>3) Total failure is likely.
>
>The terms "probable", "likely", "partial" and "total" are Navy
>terminology and were not clearly defined in the documentation. The
>terms "likely" and "total" however, represent the worst condition.
>
>Cities in bold have populations greater than 100,000. Many of the
>utilities listed service many more customers than shown here.
>
>43 cities where "partial failure is probable."
>
>CityPopulationEWGS
>Amarillo TX158,000xxxx
>Annapolis MD33,000x
>Arlington VA171,000x
>Avoca PA3,000x
>Baton Rouge LA220,000x
>Bethesda MD63,000x
>Broussard LA3,000x
>Carderock MDx
>Charlotte NC396,000xx
>Columbus OH633,000x
>Corpus Christi TX257,000x
>Crane INxDallas TX1,007,000x
>Dayton OH182,000xx
>Duluth MN85,000xx
>El Paso TX515,000xx
>Forest Park IL15,000xx
>Greensboro NC184,000x
>Highland Park IL31,000x
>Houston TX1,631,000xx
>Ingleside TX6,000x
>Key West FL25,000xxx
>Knoxville TN165,000xxx
>Lewisville AR1,000x
>Lexington Park MD10,000x
>Millington TN18,000xx
>Mobile AL196,000xx
>Montgomery AL187,000xx
>Newport News VA170,000x
>Norfolk VA261,000xx
>Pascagoula MS26,000xxx
>Peoria IL114,000x
>Philadelphia PA1,586,000x
>Portsmouth VA104,000x
>San Antonio TX936,000xx
>Sheboygan WI50,000xx
>Sugar Grove WVx
>Truth or Conseq. NM6,000x
>Tulsa OK367,000xx
>Washington DC610,000x
>Waukegan IL69,000x
>West Palm Beach FL68,000xx
>Yorktown VAx
>
>38 cities where "partial failure is likely."
>
>CityPopulationEWGS
>Albany GA78,000x
>Atlanta GA394,000xx
>Atlantic Beach FL12,000xxx
>Augusta GA234,000x
>Beaufort SC10,000xx
>Bessemer AL33,000xxxx
>Bossier City LA53,000x
>Cape Canaveral FL8,000x
>Charleston SC80,000xxx
>Chattanooga TN152,000xx
>Clearwater FL99,000xxx
>Columbia SC98,000xxx
>Columbus GA179,000x
>Fort Lauderdale FL149,000xxx
>Fort Worth TX448,000xxx
>Greenville NC45,000x
>Gulfport MS41,000xxx
>Harlingen TX49,000x
>Hawkinsville GA4,000x
>Hollandale MS4,000x
>Jacksonville FL635,000xxx
>Kingsville TX25,000x
>Meridian MS41,000xx
>Miami FL359,000xx
>Milton FL7,000xxxx
>Nashville TN488,000xxx
>New Orleans LA497,000xxx
>Orange City FLxxxOrlando FL165,000xxxx
>Panama City FL35,000xxx
>Pensacola FL58,000xxx
>Raleigh NC208,000xx
>Slidell LA24,000xxx
>Smyrna GA31,000xx
>St Marys GA8,000x
>Sullivans Island SC2,000xx
>Waco TX104,000x
>Wetumpka AL5,000x
>
>44 cities where "total failure is likely."
>
>CityPopulationEWGS
>Baltimore MD736,000xx
>Bethlehem PA71,000xx
>Bremerton WA38,000xx
>Brunswick ME15,000x
>Buffalo NY328,000xx
>Coronado CA27,000x
>Dahlgren VA1,000xx
>Earl NJxx
>Erie PA109,000xx
>Fallbrook CA22,000x
>Glen Falls NY15,000xx
>Great Falls MT55,000xxx
>Hartford CT140,000xx
>Huntington WV58,000x
>Imperial Beach CA27,000x
>Kearney NJ35,000xxx
>Lakehurst NJ3,000xx
>Mechanicsburg PA9,000xx
>Morehead City NC6,000xx
>National City CA54,000x
>New London CT29,000xxxx
>New York City NY7,323,000xx
>Newport RI29,000xx
>Oak Grove NCx
>Oak Harbor WA17,000xx
>Ogden UT64,000x
>Pacific Beach WA1,000x
>Plaineville CT16,000xx
>Pomona CA132,000xx
>Port Hadlock WA3,000x
>Port of Seattle WAxxx
>Portsmouth NH26,000xx
>Providence RI161,000xx
>Quantico VA1,000xxx
>Reading PA78,000xx
>Reno NV134,000x
>Rochester NY232,000xx
>San Jose CA782,000x
>Seal Beach CA25,000xx
>Trenton NJ89,000xx
>Warminster PA36,000xx
>Watertown NY29,000xxx
>Weymouth MAxxx
>Williamsport PA32,000xx
>
>Taking it Public
>
>There's a great scene in the movie, "A Few Good Men" where Navy lawyer
>Tom Cruise verbally battles Marine Colonel Jack Nicholson. Trapped and
>finally broken by the relentless interrogation, Nicholson snarls (as
>only he can snarl),
>
>"You can't handle the truth."
>
>The disgraced Colonel, of course, doesn't mean Tom Cruise -- he means us.
>We the People. We're the ones who can't take it. We, the unwashed
>masses, are too lazy, too stupid, too irrational. In his twisted world,
>only the anointed few, the chosen leaders, deserve access to the truth.
>
>The Federal Government is withholding the truth about Y2K for the same
>reason - they don't think we can take it. They think we'll panic and:
>
>Take all our money out of the banks.
>Cash in all our mutual funds and burst the stock market balloon.
>Break the economic system by hoarding everything in sight.
>Incite turmoil, chaos and riots.
>
>There are many reasons why their strategy is wrong but only two need to
>be mentioned. 1) This country belongs to us. 2) These people work for
>us. If something is wrong, we have a right to know and they have a
>responsibility to tell us. Will the truth result in riots, shortages and
>disruptions to the financial system? Possibly so but if our fractional
>reserve banking system and our Just-in-Time manufacturing and retail
>processes are so dangerously fragile, don't we need to know now rather
>than in the middle of the Y2K Crisis?
>
>I'm fed up with being told that institutions must be protected even if
>it means we have to be sacrificed. We are more important than the
>banks. We have a higher priority than the stock market. We're
>grown-ups and we have a right to the truth. We the People of this great
>nation have faced every challenge thrown at us in the past. It's time
>to take this one on. We can handle it.
>
>Where It Came From
>
>This information came from the US Navy and Marine Corps (Department of
>the Navy). They were apparently tasked to conduct a study of the Y2K
>exposure of their worldwide shore facilities. A copy of this study made
>its way into my hands.
>
>Military bases in the United States are rarely self-sufficient when it
>comes to utilities such as electricity, water, gas and sewer. These
>services are almost always provided by the local economy. From a Y2K
>standpoint, this leaves the bases at the mercy of the local utility
>providers. Nearly five hundred bases were assessed; approximately one
>third are expected to experience utility failures.
>
>These figures are completely out of whack with the federal government's
>August 1999 Y2K assessment which says,
>
>"It is highly unlikely that there will be national disruptions in
>electric power service on January 1, 2000. It is expected that any
>gas disruptions that do occur will have minimal impact upon consumers.
>It is increasingly unlikely that the date change will create
>disruptions in water service."
>
>Mr. Koskinen, you need to check with the folks over at the Pentagon.
>They seem to have a different opinion. Or is it possible you already
>know about this information?
>
>The information was obtained from a confidential source of the highest
>reliability and integrity. The identity of this source will be
>staunchly protected. I don't have a copy of the detailed assessments of
>the individual bases nor do I possess the information on Army or Air
>Force bases. I am submitting a request for these documents through the
>Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), however. (In fact, I encourage you
>to help out by submitting your own FOIA request for these documents.)
>
>The information from the bases and other facilities was compiled into an
>eight-page spreadsheet that is titled "Utility Master List" and dated
>June 1999. No other markings appear on the papers. In particular, (and
>this is of crucial importance) the document is not stamped or labeled
>with any national security classification markings.
>
>What You Should Do
>
>This information is vital to the well being of tens of millions of
>American citizens. The federal government is withholding it from the
>public. If you're concerned about Y2K and frustrated at the way the
>government is dealing with the crisis, there are several things you can
>do.
>
>Help get the word out about this study. Make copies of this document
>and send them to the media (radio, television and newspaper) in the 125
>communities listed in the report. In particular, contact the radio talk
>shows (national and local) and request that they have me on their
>shows. I can best be contacted by email at JimLordY2K@aol.com.
>
>Also send copies to elected officials (mayors; city council; county
>commissioners; governors and state and national level senators and
>representatives). Ask them if they are aware of these Navy Department
>assessments. Send copies to the individual utilities identified in the
>listing of cities on the website.
>
>Send FOIA requests to the Navy, Army and Air Force requesting their
>studies on the anticipated effects of Y2K-related utility failures on US
>military facilities. Sample letters can be found at the end of this
>special report.
>
>Ask everyone in your community group, family, email list etc. to visit
>the www.JimLord.to website. Then ask them to do the same thing you're
>doing. If we work together, we can break this thing open.
>
>In short, let's raise hell.
>
>Implications
>
>1. One need not be even a mild "doom and gloomer" to realize that
>failures of the magnitude indicated in this Navy Department study are
>potentially catastrophic. The lives and health of millions of people
>are at stake. The national economy is threatened. Our way of life is
>jeopardized. The national security is at risk.
>
>2. That the government is withholding this information from the American
>people seems to me a monstrous abandonment of principle. Each of these
>military bases has a commanding officer. For large bases this is
>typically a Navy Captain or a Marine Colonel. These military leaders
>have raised their hands in the air and sworn an oath to support and
>defend the Constitution. (I recall this oath clearly having taken it
>several times during my own naval career and having administered it
>numerous times during reenlistment ceremonies.)
>
>How can these commissioned officers remotely imagine that keeping this
>information from the citizens of this nation is in any way upholding
>their duty? I have no doubt they have been instructed by higher
>authority to maintain silence about these Y2K risks. How can they look
>themselves in the mirror each morning and conceive that what they are
>doing is right?
>
>These commanders report to a chain of command of Admirals and Generals
>culminating in the Joint Chiefs of Staff. How can these so-called
>"public servants" know that 26 million citizens are in such jeopardy and
>remain silent?
>
>In the simplest terms - I stand bitterly ashamed of my former comrades.
>I cannot conceive of a blacker mark on the military leadership of the
>nation.
>
>3. The government is holding out on its own people. The Navy uses a
>special message called an "ALNAV" (meaning all Navy) to communicate
>information to all naval personnel at once. On February 10, 1999, the
>Secretary of the Navy released such a message telling all officers and
>enlisted personnel they had nothing to worry about from Y2K. The
>message identifier is SECNAV 101715Z FEB 99. Here's a quote,
>
>"Speculation that power distribution systems will experience widespread
>failures are not based on facts or rational analysis. Most experts
>believe water treatment and distribution should not be greatly affected
>by the Y2K problem. Because of extensive preparation, the effects of
>the Y2K bug will be minimal on the lives of you and your family."
>
>Perhaps the Navy Department had not yet completed their facility Y2K
>assessment last February when the ALNAV was promulgated. Now that they
>understand their Y2K exposure, I wonder when they will let all those
>sailors and their families know about the anticipated utility failures?
>After all, the first line in the above mentioned ALNAV states,
>
>"It is important that we provide our sailors with sound, useful
>information on the potential impact of Y2K on their personal and
>professional lives, as well as the lives of their families."
>
>I retired from the Naval Service in 1983 but I still hold a commission
>as a regular officer. I am still under oath. In "my" Navy, the highest
>unwritten duty of a Naval Officer was to take care of his people. This
>bit of traditional wisdom is apparently little practiced today. To each
>of the Naval and Marine Corps Officers who has had access to the
>information described herein, I lay down a simple challenge. Live up to
>this duty. Come forth. Tell us the truth.
>
>4. If we're being lied to about this, how can we believe anything the
>government tells us about Y2K? How bad is this thing really going to be?
>
>Impact on Military Readiness
>
>These revelations imply a severe effect on military readiness in the
>United States and at several important locations overseas. In this
>country, for example the major Marine Corps bases at Quantico, Virginia
>and Camp LeJeune, North Carolina are expected to experience utility
>failures. The latter is of special personal concern - my son and his
>family are stationed there.
>
>Another essential but not widely appreciated Marine Corps facility is at
>special risk. The base at Albany, Georgia is the hub of all USMC
>logistics activities. The inability of this base to provide services
>would pose a devastating threat to the entire US Marine Corps. Albany
>is one of three unfortunate cities expected to have utility failures in
>all four areas: electricity, water, gas and sewer.
>
>The US Navy expects serious problems as well. The extensive complex of
>facilities at their primary east-coast port at Norfolk/Portsmouth,
>Virginia is projected to be without water or natural gas. The Navy
>Space Command at Dahlgren, Virginia; is in jeopardy. The Naval Air
>Stations at North Island, California; Whidby Island, Washington, Cecil
>Field, Florida; and Pensacola, Florida are at risk. The key submarine
>bases at Kings Bay, Georgia and New London, Connecticut are on the
>list. The latter is another of the three stateside locations expected
>to have failures of all four types of utilities.
>
>The facility at Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania is also of special concern.
>Much of the US Navy's logistics support is conducted at this base which
>is expected to see both gas and sewer failures.
>
>Overseas, critical bases at Rota, Spain; Sigonella and Naples, Italy;
>(headquarters of the Mediterranean (6th) Fleet); Bahrain; Guam; Puerto
>Rico; and Okinawa are impacted. Of the ten facilities listed in the
>United Kingdom, all (mostly in London) were expected to experience
>failures of all four utilities.
>
>Potential Repercussions
>
>I don't imagine the government (the Navy Department in particular) is
>going to be very pleased that this information has made its way into the
>sunlight. If we all do our job, they are going to come under some
>pretty intense scrutiny. Several people who have seen this report
>opined that I could be in financial, legal or even physical jeopardy.
>Quite frankly, that kind of stuff is of little concern to me. I could
>not withhold this information and live with myself. No person of honor
>and integrity could
>
>As a precaution, I have registered my Internet domain name - JimLord.to
>- in Tonga, an island nation in the South Pacific. I have also hidden
>away several copies of the Navy Department documentation and my Internet
>files in safe keeping in several states. Friends are standing by to
>keep this information in the public eye. Just in case.
>
>This stuff needs to see the light of day. I intend to do everything in
>my power to make that happen. Besides, you the reader are the best
>protection I could have. The more of you there are, the safer I
>become. Do your part and get this critical information into the hands
>of as many people as you can. Help keep Jim Lord out of jail (grin).
>
>Electric Utility Failures
>
>Somebody needs to let the North American Electric Reliability Council
>(NERC) know about the Navy study. For their benefit and yours, here is
>a list of 29 electrical utilities the Navy expects to fail. Read over
>this list carefully. Some of the Navy facilities are quite small but
>the electric company that provides their service has a very large
>customer base. If your electrical company is included, you need to raise
>hell with them and find out if they know how the Navy feels about them.
>
>Electrical Utilities Expected to Fail
>
>Baldwin EMC, Milton FL
>Bessemer Utilities, Bessemer AL
>Central Louisiana Electric, Slidell LA
>City of Albany GA
>City of Key West FL
>City Public Service Board, San Antonio TX
>Clay Electric Cooperative, Jacksonville FL
>Coastal Electric Members, Jacksonville FL
>Daviess Martin County Rural Elect, Crane IN
>Dayton Power & Light, Dayton OH
>El Paso Electric Co., El Paso TX
>Escambia River Elec Co., Milton FL, Pensacola FL
>Florida Power and Light, Canaveral FL, Ft Lauderdale FL
>Florida Power Corp, Clearwater FL
>Gulf States Utilities, Orange City FL
>JEA, Atlantic Beach FL, Jacksonville FL
>Knoxville Utilities Board, Knoxville TN
>Middle Georgia Elec, Hawkinsville GA
>Mississippi Power and Light, Gulfport MS
>Northeast Utilities, New London CT
>Orlando Utilities Commission, Orlando FLPort of Seattle WA
>Riviera Utilities, Milton FL
>Sierra Electric Cooperative, Truth or Conseq. NM
>South Central Power, Columbus OH
>Southern Pine Elec Coop, Milton FL
>Southwest Arkansas Electric, Lewisville AR
>Southwest Louisiana Electric, Broussard LA
>Southwestern Public Services, Amarillo TX
>Twin County Electric, Hollandale MS
>
>Gas Company Failures
>
>This is a list of forty gas companies the Navy Department expects to
>fail. Some of the cities mentioned are quite small but the service area
>for the utility mentioned has a very large customer base. Check this
>list carefully to see if your gas company is included.
>
>Gas Utilities Expected to Fail
>
>Alabama Gas Corp, Bessemer AL
>Atlanta Gas Light Co., Atlanta GA
>Baltimore Gas & Electric, Annapolis MD
>Boston Gas, Weymouth MA
>City of Albany GA
>City of Bethlehem PA
>City of Bossier City LA
>City of Buffalo, NY
>City of Great Falls MT
>City of Pascagoula MS
>City of Pensacola FL
>City Public Service Board, San Antonio TX
>Columbia Gas of Virginia, Portsmouth VA, Quantico VA
>Dayton Power & Light, Dayton OH
>Energas Co, Amarillo TX
>Interenergy Corp, Charleston SC
>Knoxville Utilities Board, Knoxville TN
>Louisiana Gas Service, New Orleans LA
>Mobile Gas Service Corp, Mobile AL
>Mountaineer Gas, Sugar Grove WV
>Nashville Gas Service, Nashville TN
>New Jersey Natural Gas, Earl NJ
>New York State El, New London CT
>Niagra Mohawk, Watertown NY
>NorAm Energy Management, Pensacola FL
>North Carolina Gas, Morehead City
>NCNorthern Utilities, Portsmouth NH
>Okaloosa Gas District, Milton FL
>Orlando Utilities Commission, Orlando FL
>PECO Energy, Warminster PA
>Penn Gas & Water, Avoca PA, Williamsport PA
>Philadelphia Gas, Philadelphia PA
>Providence Energy, Newport RI
>PSE&G, Kearney NJ
>Rochester Gas & Electric, Rochester NY
>UGI Corp, Mechanicsburg PA
>United Cities Gas Co, Columbia SC
>Virginia Natural Gas, Newport News VA, Norfolk VA, Yorktown VA
>Washington Gas Co., Arlington VA, Bethesda MD, Carderock MD, Lexington
>Park MD, Washington DC
>West Florida Natural Gas, Panama City FL
>
>A Y2K Protest
>
>Thirty years ago, the Pentagon Papers revealed widespread government
>deceit in the prosecution of the Vietnam War. The papers and the
>resultant protests eventually rooted out the truth and changed United
>States policy. Today, this Navy Department study could accomplish the
>same objectives. We can perhaps use it to force the government to come
>clean on Y2K. Our opportunity comes just in the nick of time. If we
>act fast.
>
>I recently gave an hour-long speech titled "Y2K Surprises - Why It Won't
>Turn Out Like You Think." It was the first time the Navy Department
>survey information was revealed in public. In the speech, I discussed
>why I don't think the national electrical grids will fail and why I
>believe water is a much greater utility risk than electricity.
>(Incidentally, this supposition is clearly supported by the Navy
>Department survey.)
>
>I also showed why an electronic run on the banking system is a greater
>danger than a cash panic. I went on to explain why January 2000 will
>not be the peak of the Year 2000 Crisis and why the real peak is 9-18
>months down the road.
>
>I think it was my most effective speech. To encourage the widest
>possible dissemination of this information and to make it as affordable
>as possible, the price of this hour-long tape is as low as possible.
>Along with the tape you'll receive a printed copy of this entire report
>and sample letters you can send to public officials and local media
>contacts. You can also download this printed material at no cost at my
>website at:
>www.JimLord.to
>
>These "Y2K Protest Packs" are just $5.00 each (shipping and handling are
>included). Ten or more are $4.50 each and 100 or more are $4.00 each.
>Let's turn the heat up on these guys. Order your "Y2K Protest Packs" by
>calling toll-free: 888-925-2555
>
>About the Author
>
>Jim Lord is the author of, "A Survival Guide for the Year 2000 Problem:
>Consumer Solutions for the Worst Technical Blunder in History" a
>practical, 270 page guide to preparation for the Year 2000 Computer
>Crisis. He has written nearly ninety articles on Y2K. He is also the
>co-editor with James Talmage Stevens of the "Journal of Personal
>Freedom", a newsletter which provides practical guidance in the
>restoration of Liberty through preparedness and self-reliance.
>
>Mr. Lord has advised Congressional staffers, The Congressional Research
>Service, the Department of Defense, the Center for Security Policy, and
>the US Taxpayer's Alliance, and is a Y2K Research Associate at George
>Washington University. He has appeared on more than 200 radio talk
>shows as well as Fox News, ABC NightLine, the Discovery Channel, C-Span
>and PAX TV.
>
>He appeared on the same speaking agenda with Nobel prizewinner Milton
>Friedman and Lady Margaret Thatcher at the Blanchard Investor Conference
>in New Orleans. He has debated Y2K with Harry Browne, recent
>Libertarian Party presidential candidate and Gary North, a prominent Y2K
>expert and writer. He has been a featured speaker at the World Future
>Society, the Conservative Caucus, many investor conferences, numerous
>Y2K community preparedness seminars, and at the Eris Society in Aspen,
>Colorado.
>
>Mr. Lord is a retired Naval Officer with 24 years active service who
>came up through the enlisted ranks. His career was spent in the
>electronics field, including a tour as the Electronics Maintenance
>Officer on an aircraft carrier. At age 33, he earned a degree in
>Business, graduating with honors from the Naval Postgraduate School in
>Monterey, California. Following his military career, Mr. Lord was
>involved in shipbuilding, communication systems design, satellite
>systems, software engineering, training and marketing. This experience
>included nine years in the software industry. He also taught business
>courses at the college level for several years.
>
>
>Your Name
>Your Address
>Date
>(Sample FOIA Request)
>
>Name of Agency
>Address of Agency
>(See Below)
>
>Re: Freedom of Information Act Request
>
>Dear Sir:
>
>This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
>
>I request that a copy of the following document be provided to me.
>
>"Assessment of the Year 2000 (Y2K) Risk to Utilities at American
>Military Bases and Facilities," (or a similar title). This document
>lists military bases and facilities in the United States and foreign
>countries, the cities in which they are located, and scores the Y2K risk
>of failures to electrical, water, gas and sewer services at each base.
>The names of the utility companies providing these services may be
>included. The document may also be called a ìMaster Utility List.î The
>document should be available from the Y2K Program Office for your
>agency.
>
>In order to determine my status to assess fees you should know that I am
>an individual seeking information for my personal use and not for any
>commercial purposes.
>
>Thank you for your consideration of this request.
>
>Sincerely,
>
>(Signature)
>
>Your Name
>
>
>
>(Send this letter to each of the following agencies:)
>
>Department of the Army Department of the Navy Department of the Air
>Force
>FOIA/Privacy Acts Office Chief of Naval Operations 11CS/SCSR (FOIA)
>TAPC-PDR-PF N09B30 1000 Air Force Pentagon
>7798 Cissna Road, Suite 205 2000 Navy Pentagon Washington DC 20330 1000
>Springfield VA 22150-3197 Washington DC 20350-2000
>
>