Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU

From: Magnus Bernhardsen (magnus.bernhardsen@nm.no)
Date: Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:01:42 MET

  • Next message: Trond Andresen: "action@klassekampen.no: E-post-nyhetstjeneste"

    ISSUE 2112 Wednesday 7 March 2001 Euro-court outlaws criticism of EU
    By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard in Brussels

    European Court of Justice
    Now it's blasphemy to mock Europe [Dec '00] - The Spectator

    THE European Court of Justice ruled yesterday that the European Union can
    lawfully suppress political criticism of its institutions and of leading
    figures, sweeping aside English Common Law and 50 years of European
    precedents on civil liberties.

    The EU's top court found that the European Commission was entitled to sack
    Bernard Connolly, a British economist dismissed in 1995 for writing a
    critique of European monetary integration entitled The Rotten Heart of
    Europe.

    The ruling stated that the commission could restrict dissent in order to
    "protect the rights of others" and punish individuals who "damaged the
    institution's image and reputation". The case has wider implications for
    free speech that could extend to EU citizens who do not work for the
    Brussels bureaucracy.

    The court called the Connolly book "aggressive, derogatory and insulting",
    taking particular umbrage at the author's suggestion that Economic and
    Monetary Union was a threat to democracy, freedom and "ultimately peace".

    However, it dropped an argument put forward three months ago by the
    advocate-general, Damaso Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, which implied that Mr
    Connolly's criticism of the EU was akin to extreme blasphemy, and therefore
    not protected speech.

    Mr Connolly, who has been told to pay the European Commission's legal costs,
    said the proceedings did not amount to a fair hearing. He said: "We're back
    to the Star Chamber and Acts of Attainder: the rights of defendants are not
    respected or guaranteed in any way; the offence of seditious libel has been
    resurrected."

    Mr Colomer wrote in his opinion last November that a landmark British case
    on free speech had "no foundation or relevance" in European law, suggesting
    that the European Court was unwilling to give much consideration to British
    legal tradition.

    Mr Connolly now intends to take his case to Europe's other court, the non-EU
    European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Mar 07 2001 - 10:05:39 MET