Robots, Automation, High Tech and Full Employment

From: John Gelles (jjgelles@rain.org)
Date: Fri Feb 02 2001 - 09:32:20 MET

  • Next message: Oddmund Garvik: "Ei anna verd er mogleg"

        Global capitalism today tolerates (even
        promotes) unemployment at some rate in
        excess of zero -- and many say it really
        aims at six percent (including necessary
        job changing).

        Unemployment of ten percent is common.
        Still higher levels of unemployment exist
        in underdeveloped nations and
        underdeveloped regions of developed
        nations.

        In spite of the above conditions every
        fool knows that only 100% full employment
        is right for himself -- full employment or
        a full pension with lots of hobbies.

        Logical ideas on this topic must start with
        an eventual economy of robots and full
        automation where few people work for the
        benefit of others. They will work to live a life
        where virtue absorbs their time rather than
        vice.

        Between now and then, while all of us are
        still needed to do things for others, the
        problem we face is financing the"others"
        with purchasing power to create full
        employment at high profits and wages.

        We should start with that portion of the
        "others" represented by public agencies
        that are elements of local, state and
        national government. These public
        agencies need us to work on the
        environment, the infrastructure, the
        normal list of things government
        provides and does. These must not
        wait on taxes to spend money.

        They must be empowered to spend
        money authorized by an initial high
        power money spending system
        (HPMSS).

        The HPMSS cannot be allowed to
        cause hyper-inflation.

        It must be allowed to fight inflation by
        super-computation of how much it can
        spend -- after evaluating budget requests,
        estimates of public saving, and estimated
        future prices for the necessities of life
        based on estimated future supply.

        Saving, as referred to above, will be
        protected against inflation in the price of
        necessities. Luxuries will rise in price
        to play the role that taxes do today.

        The above HPMSS will employ all people
        really needed to work for others.

        There will still be people not needed.
        These will be fully self-employed if they
        have a civil right to a microloan or self-
        employment wage advance. Their work
        may in time successfully sell the product
        of their self-employment to others. But
        much will not be sold. It will represent
        affordable waste -- assuming all
        necessary jobs have been created by
        the HPMSS as government or contractor
        jobs. Not to worry: hyper- inflation must
        be avoided, but profit is not necessary
        for all enterprise all the time.

        Employment is necessary. Profit is not.
        Profit is good. But employment is critical.

        If we refuse to spend money that is needed
        because it is not received from taxes or
        bond sales, we will be doomed. The savings
        referred to above amount to a bond sale
        but they are timed to allow full employment
        and full funding of a monetary system of
        production. It is the system we use in war.

        John Gelles



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 02 2001 - 18:11:10 MET