KK- Forum,
videresender Edward Hermans kommentarer til Stratfor-analysen Øistein Holen
sendt til KK-Forum for en tid siden. Utdrag:
"It seems highly likely that the 10,000 or 11,000 figure is a propaganda
fabrication, and that the true number may be in the high hundreds or as many
as one or two thousand. This lesser figure is of course horrendous, but it
falls far short of a "genocide" standard, and is considerably smaller than
the Indonesian army- militia killings in East Timor even BEFORE the August
30 referendum, that elicited no response whatever from Clinton, Blair and
company."
...
" During the bombing war, the media spent a great deal of reportorial
effort passing along NATO estimates of Serb mass killings and trying to
collect confirming data on Serb atrocities from Albanian refugees.
But now that the killing fields are proving to be less fertile than expected
the mainstream media are exceedingly quiet on the subject. Their job was
done, however, in helping rationalize the NATO display of its "resolve" and
its continuing role in protecting human rights, and its success in returning
Serbia to the stone age. In short, truth is not the business of the media
members of "the team."
And you may be sure the mainstream media are not going to turn their
attention to the killing fields of East Timor or Turkish Kurdistan, or to
the dying children of sanction-ridden Iraq: Bill, Madeleine, and the other
members of "the team" want them to stay away from those much more fertile
fields, and they (and Susan, Todd, and Vaclav also) will do so."
Her er hele stasen:
**********************************
X-Authentication-Warning: dojo.tao.ca: znet set sender to
owner-znetcommentary@tao.ca using -f
From: "Michael Albert" <sysop@zmag.org>
To: <znetcommentary@tao.ca>
Subject: ZNet Commentary / Oct 25 / Ed Herman / Missing Bodies
Date: Sun, 24 Oct 1999 23:35:29 +0100
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-znetcommentary@tao.ca
Here is today's ZNet Commentary Delivery from Edward Herman.
If you pass this comment along to others, please include an explanation that
Commentaries are a premium sent to Sustainer Donors of Z/ZNet and that to
learn more about the project folks can consult ZNet (http://www.zmag.org)
and specifically the Sustainer Pages
(http://www.zmag.org/Commentaries/donorform.htm. Please do not send
commentaries repeatedly to others -- encourage others to subscribe.
Here then is today's ZNet Commentary...
----------------------------
MISSING BODIES, OR ATROCITIES MANAGEMENT, PART 2
Edward S. Herman
A Reuters news dispatch of October 13 bylined Pristina, Kosovo, is entitled
" Absolutely No Bodies Found in Supposed Mine Shaft Mass Grave in Kosovo."
This follows an earlier report by a Spanish forensic team that went into a
part of Kosovo allegedly rich in killing fields, where instead of the
predicted thousands the team found 187 bodies. In its examination of 30 mass
grave sites the FBI has found a total of almost 200 bodies. In Ljubenic, a
mass grave alleged to contain some 350 bodies, when fully exhumed contained
only seven bodies. In town after town, alleged mass graves were found to be
empty or contained only one or two bodies.
In an extensive review of the numerous reports, the research organization
Stratfor concludes that "the numbers of dead so far are in the hundreds, not
the thousands" ("Where Are Kosovo's Killing Fields?" Oct. 20, 1999).
Stratfor acknowledges that huge new graves may be found, but as the ethnic
Albanians were presumably eager to reveal the biggest sites, and the largest
sites should have had the most witnesses and most visibility for
investigative teams, much larger numbers are deemed unlikely. "The killing
of ethnic Albanian civilians appears to be orders of magnitude below the
claims of NATO, alliance governments and early media reports."
What makes this evidence important is that NATO's assault on Yugoslavia was
built on the claim that the government was engaging in ethnic cleansing
before March 24, and that thereafter, according to plan, it escalated its
violence to the level of genocide. NATO eventually gravitated to the number
of 10,000 ethnic Albanians butchered by the Serbian army and paramilitaries.
In early August Bernard Kouchner, the UN administrator in Kosovo, claimed
that 11,000 had been killed, based on figures allegedly supplied by the
International Crimes Tribunal for the Former Republic of Yugoslavia (ICTY).
But the ICTY quickly denied having supplied such a number, and it was ICTY
investigators who found the mine shaft supposedly containing 700 Albanian
bodies completely empty.
It seems highly likely that the 10,000 or 11,000 figure is a propaganda
fabrication, and that the true number may be in the high hundreds or as many
as one or two thousand. This lesser figure is of course horrendous, but it
falls far short of a "genocide" standard, and is considerably smaller than
the Indonesian army- militia killings in East Timor even BEFORE the August
30 referendum, that elicited no response whatever from Clinton, Blair and
company.
Where did the 10,000 figure come from? Such a round number suggests a
straightforward propaganda concoction, but the numbers were of course built
up by refugee claims, and Stratfor notes that "both governments and outside
observers relied on sources controlled by the KLA, both before and during
the war.....the sophisticated public relations machine of the KLA and the
fog of war may have generated a perception that is now proving dubious."
But atrocities management and the patriotic gullibility factor must be
considered crucial in this process of inflating claims of enemy villainy.
Government lying on enemy atrocities is standard operating procedure in
building support for war. What is more interesting, however, is that the
gullible transmission of official propaganda is standard operating procedure
for the U.S. mainstream media. As soon as a war starts, the mainstream media
get "on the team," suspend critical analysis, and allow themselves to be led
by the nose by official opinion. There is a patriotic bandwagon effect that
causes virtually all reporters to toe the official line, at threat of
ostracization and removal (a la Raymond Bonner in the Central American
wars). Even straight reporting from enemy lines (like Bonner's) becomes
traitorous--one should stick to official handouts and energetic attempts to
confirm official claims. It becomes a journalistic postulate that while
enemy sources lie, our official sources tell the truth. As this assumption
about our officials is confuted by a steady stream of evidence, past and
present, it reflects a clear and straightforward abandonment of honest
journalism.
It was a notable feature of the Persian Gulf War that Peter Arnett's on-site
reporting from Baghdad about bombed civilian facilities angered much of the
U.S. media as well as the Pentagon and Bush administration. Arnett was
accused of gullibility in the service of Saddam Hussein, when in fact Arnett
was quite aware of the constraints on him, whereas the reporters in
Washington who sneered at Arnett were completely unaware of their own
conduit role. This was partly because the Washington reporters believed so
deeply in the rightness of their cause that they thought themselves
uncompromised by being "on the team," and that Arnett failed by refusing to
ignore inconvenient facts that a "team player" would see hurt the cause.
Noam Chomsky has told the story of the Soviet journalist Vladimir Danchev,
who for five successive days in May 1983 denounced the Soviet invasion of
Afghanistan and urged the Afghans to resist this aggression. U.S.
journalists applauded, and they denounced the Soviets for taking Danchev off
the air. But as Chomsky pointed out, there were no U.S. reporters as bold as
Danchev. During the Vietnam war no mainstream journalist denounced the U.S.
attack as "aggression" and urged the Vietnamese to resist. No, the
internalized patriotic gullibility and bandwagon effect caused them all to
regard the U.S. as resisting "internal aggression" by the Vietnamese. This
swallowing and self-righteous regurgitation of state propaganda as truth, on
a system-wide and uncoerced basis, is what makes the Free Press of the U.S.
so effective.
So in the case of the Yugoslav war, the mainstream media made it possible
for a series of official lies to be institutionalized: the Serb refusal to
negotiate at Rambouillet (whereas the Serbs were given an ultimatum with a
proviso that assured rejection, to allow bombing); the humanitarian
objective (whereas neither real aim nor result was humanitarian, and as
Canadian former OSCE monitor Rollie Keith stated, NATO's policy turned "an
internal humanitarian problem into a disaster"); and the Serb attempt at
genocide by plan, not in any way induced by the NATO bombing (for which no
evidence has been given, and contradicted by the earier Serb admission of
1500 OSCE observers).
Atrocities management played an important role in the institutionalization
of NATO lies and the initiation of bombing. There was a series of alleged
massacres, some real and some concoted, but all of them attracting intense
and indignant coverage. Some, like the one at Racak on January 15, 1999,
were extremely well timed to forward the program of NATO proponents of a
policy of force. And an excellent case can be made that the Racak incident
was provoked, its victim numbers and character inflated and distorted, and
the atrocity exploited and managed for political ends (see Renaud Girard, in
the French daily Le Figaro, January 20, 1999). During the bombing war, the
media spent a great deal of reportorial effort passing along NATO estimates
of Serb mass killings and trying to collect confirming data on Serb
atrocities from Albanian refugees.
But now that the killing fields are proving to be less fertile than expected
the mainstream media are exceedingly quiet on the subject. Their job was
done, however, in helping rationalize the NATO display of its "resolve" and
its continuing role in protecting human rights, and its success in returning
Serbia to the stone age. In short, truth is not the business of the media
members of "the team."
And you may be sure the mainstream media are not going to turn their
attention to the killing fields of East Timor or Turkish Kurdistan, or to
the dying children of sanction-ridden Iraq: Bill, Madeleine, and the other
members of "the team" want them to stay away from those much more fertile
fields, and they (and Susan, Todd, and Vaclav also) will do so.
**************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 13 2000 - 15:17:29 MET